[°´£º±¾ÎÄÑ¡×ÔÄá¿Ë¡¤Ë¹Ì¹¸ç˹±àµÄ¡¶ÏÖ´úÒÕÊõµÄ¸ÅÄî¨D¨D´ÓÒ°ÊÞÅɵ½ºóÏÖ´úÖ÷Òå¡·£¬µÚÈý°æÀ©±àºÍÐÞ¶©°æ¡££¨concepts of modern art: from fauvism to postmodrnism. edited by nikos stangos, thames and hudson, 1994.£©]
1¡¢norman k. denzin, ¡®post-modern social theory¡¯, sociological theory, vol.4, no2, fall 1986, pp. 194-204.
2¡¢charles jencks, the language of post-modern architecture, london, 1977, cited in bruce d. kurtz, contemporary art 1965-1990, englewood cliffs, 1992, p.190; corinne robins, the pluralist era: american art, 1968-1981, new york, 1984, p.1.
3¡¢charles jencks, letter, times literary supplement, 12 march 1993.
4¡¢jean baudrillard, simulations, trans. paul foss, paul patton and philip beitchman, new york, 1983.
5¡¢eleanor heartney, ¡®david salle: impersonal effects¡¯, art in america, june 1988, p.121.
6¡¢thomas lawson, ¡®last exit: painting¡¯, artforum, vol.20, no.2, october 1981, pp. 40-7.
7¡¢mark stevens, ¡®a painter¡¯s pratfall¡¯, newsweek, 16 november 1987, p.119; robert hughes, ¡®expressionist bric-a-brac¡¯, time, 1 november 1982, p.71.
8¡¢robert hughes, ¡®random bits from the image haze¡¯, time, 9 february 1987, pp. 68-9.
9¡¢andreas huyssen, ¡®mapping the post-modern¡¯, new german critique, no.33, fall 1984, reprinted in after the great divide: modernism, mass culture, post-modernism, bloomington, 1986, pp. 178-221.
10¡¢jackie brookner (ed.), art and ecology, special issue of art journal, summer 1992.
11¡¢howardena pindell, ¡®art world racism: a documentation¡¯, new art examiner, march 1989, pp. 32-4; patricia failing, ¡®black artists today: a case of exclusion¡¯, art news, march 1989, pp. 124-31.
12¡¢ÎÒҪ˵£¬µÃµ½ÒÕÊõ½ç´ó²¿·ÖÈ˳ÐÈϵÄÉ«²ÊÒÕÊõ¼Ò£¨the artists of colour£©£¬Èç±´Ì©¡¤Èø¶û£¨betye saar£©,·Ñ˹¡¤ÁֹŶûµÂ£¨faith ringgold£©,ÇÇÄÉ¡¤¿ì¿´¡¤Ê·ÃÜ˹£¨ jaune quick-to-see smith£©£¬»òµçÓ°ÖÆ×÷ÈËÂíÁú¡¤Àï¸ñ˹£¨marlon riggs£©ºÍÒÁÈø¿Ë¡¤ÖìÀû°²£¨isaac julien£©£¬ÊÇͨ¹ýËûÃÇ×÷ΪŮÐÔÖ÷ÒåÕß»òÕßͬÐÔÁµÕßµÄÖØºÏµÄÉí·Ý¶øµÃÒÔ´òÈëÔÓÖ¾¡¢ÃÀÊõ¹Ý¡¢»ùïÖ½ðºÍ¹ÛÖڵġ£É«²ÊÒÕÊõ¼ÒµÄÅ®ÐÔÖ÷Òå»òͬÐÔÁµÕß¡°±£Ö¤ÈËÉí·Ý¡±£¨sponsorship£©Í¨¹ýÒÕÊõ½ç½øÈëÈËÃÇÊÓÒ°µÄ×îºÃÀý×Ó£¬ÓÐharmony hammond¡¯s co-curatorship with jaune quick-to-see smith of women of sweetgrass, cedar and sage, gallery of the american indian community house, new york, 1985; lucky lippard¡¯s mixed blessings: new art in a multicultural america, new york, 1990; and thomas socolowski¡¯s initiation of interrogating identity, grey art gallery and study center, new york, 1991.
13¡¢surveys of women¡¯s artistic production through history include griselda pollock and rozsika parker, old mistresses: women, art and ideology, london, 1990. for surveys of homosexuality in the arts, see james saslow, ¡®closets in the museum: homophobia and art history¡¯, in karla jay and allen young (eds), lavender perspective: homosexuality and art in the last one hundred years in the west, london, 1986. an excellent in-depth study of homosexuality in renaissance art is saslow¡¯s ganymede in the renaissance: homosexuality in art and society, new haven, 1986.
14¡¢a concrete example is seen in the rules of the abstract expressionists¡¯ ¡®artists club¡¯, the founding constitution of which excluded dealers, critics, women and homosexuals from participation. see ann eden gibson, abstract expressionism, race, and gender, new haven, 1994.
15¡¢hilton kramer, revenge of the philistines: art and culture, 1972-1984, new york, 1985.
16¡¢griselda pollock, ¡®feminism and modernism¡¯, in rozsika parker and griselda pollock (eds), framing feminism: art and the women¡¯s movement, 1970-1985, london, 1987, pp. 79-122. for a recent critique ranging beyond the art world, see somer brodribb, nothing mat(t)ers: a feminist critique of post-modernism, north melbourne (australia), 1992.
17¡¢julian schnabel, ¡®the patients and the doctors¡¯, artforum, february 1984, pp. 54-8. see also mary lee corlett, ¡®jackson pollock: american culture, the media and the myth¡¯, rutgers art review, 8, 1987, pp. 71-106.
18¡¢lucy lippard, ¡®sweeping exchanges: the contribution of feminism to the art of the 1970s¡¯, art journal, fall/winter 1980, reprinted in get the message: a decade of art for social change, new york, 1984, pp. 149-58. although pollock¡¯s essay is phrased as a critique of lippard, it follows substantially from lippard¡¯s points, suggesting that feminists are themselves sometimes susceptible to the claims for authoritative originality that they attribute to modernism.
19¡¢judy chicago, through the flower: my struggle as a woman artist, garden city, n.y., 1977; the dinner party: a symbol of our heritage, garden city, 1979; embroidering our heritage: the dinner party needlework, garden city, 1980; the birth project, garden city, 1985.
20¡¢david salle, 1981, interview by peter schjeldahl, in jeanne siegel (ed.), art words 2: discourse on the early 89s, ann arbor, 1988, reprinted as art talk: the early 80s, new york, p. 171.
carol zemel, ¡®postmodern pictures of erotic fantasy and social space¡¯, genders, 4, spring 1989, pp. 27 and 31-2. for a similar critique, see robert storr, ¡®salle¡¯s gender machine¡¯, art in america, june 1988, pp. 24-5.
21¡¢salle, interviewed by schjeldahl, p.172.
22¡¢sophie calle, suite v¨¦nitienne, and jean baudrillard, ¡®please follow me¡¯ (published as one volume), seattle, 1988, pp. 82 and 86 [final ellipsis of block quote in original].
23¡¢anne rochette, ¡®the post-beaubourg generation¡¯, art in america, june 1987, pp. 41-9.
24¡¢bette gordon, ¡®varity: the pleasure in looking¡¯, in carole s. vance (ed.), pleasure and danger: exploring female sexuality, london, 1984, pp. 189-203. for the theoretical background for these ideas, see laura mulvey, ¡®visual pleasure and narrative cinema¡¯, 1975, in visual and other pleasures, bloomington, indiana, 1989, pp. 14-26.
25¡¢hal foster, ¡®subversive signs¡¯, art in america, november 1982, pp. 88-92.
26¡¢kenneth baker, ¡¯the art of barbara kruger¡¯, in slices of life: the art of barbara kruger, krannert art museum, university of illinois at urbana-champaign, 1986, pp. 3-5.
27¡¢masako kamimura, ¡®barbara kruger: art of representation¡¯, woman¡¯s art journal, spring/summer 1987, pp. 40-3. kamimura here acknowledges as an ¡®exception¡¯ the kruger piece ¡®you are not yourself¡¯.
28¡¢craig owens, catalogue essay in barbara kruger: ¡°we won¡¯t play nature to your culture¡±, institute of contemporary arts, london, 1983, revised as ¡®the medusa effect or, the specular ruse¡¯, art in america, january 1984, pp. 97-105. this is also reprinted in beyond recognition ¨C representation, power, and culture, berkeley, los angeles, oxford, 1992, pp. 191-200.
29¡¢lucy lippard, ¡®both sides now [a reprise]¡¯, heresies, 24, fall, 1989, pp. 29-34.
30¡¢lucy lippard, ¡®hanging onto baby, heating up the bathwater¡¯, 1988, revised and reprinted in craig little and mark o¡¯brian (eds), reimaging america: the arts of social change, philadelphia, 1990, pp. 227-34.
31¡¢douglas crimp and adam rolston, aids demo graphics, seattle, 1990, p. 18. douglas crimp, ¡®the boys in my bedroom¡¯, art in america, february 1990, pp. 47-9. see also ¡®aids: cultural analysis, cultural activism¡¯, october, 43, winter 1987.
32¡¢nicolas moufarrege, ¡®lavender: on homosexuality and art¡¯, arts, october 1982, p. 84. see also daniel j. cameron, extended sensibilities: homosexual presence in contemporary art, new museum, new york, 1982; gladys ostermann, ¡®panel reviews ¨C recent issues and perspectives: homosexual sensibilities¡¯, women artists news, vol. 8, no. 3, spring 1983, pp. 6-9.
33¡¢cindy nemser, art talk: conversations with twelve women artists, new york, 1975, p. 4.
34¡¢simon watney, policing desire: pornography, aids and the media, london, 1987.
35¡¢robert atkins in conversation with thomas sokolowski, from media to metaphor: art about aids, independent curators inc., new york, 1992, p. 18. an earlier important exhibition of aids related work is witnesses: against our vanishing, artists space, new york, 1989.
36¡¢joyce fernandes, ¡®sex into sexuality: a feminist agenda for the ¡®90s¡¯, art journal, summer 1991, pp. 35-8.
37¡¢illustrations of act up graphics may be found in crimp and rolston, aids demo graphics, cited above (note 32).
38¡¢james meyer, ¡®aids and post-modernism¡¯, arts, april 1992, pp. 62-8.
39¡¢hal foster, recordings: art, spectacle, cultural politics, port townsend, washington, 1985, pp. 99-115, 146, 154-5, 170, 176-7, ellipses in original.
40¡¢craig owens, ¡®the discourse of others: feminists and postmodernism¡¯, in hal foster (ed.), the anti-aesthetic: essays in post-modern culture, port townsend, washington, 1983, pp. 57-82; reprinted in norma broude and mary garrard (eds), the expanding discourse: feminism and art history, new york, 1992, pp. 487-502; howard cliffs, 1990, pp. 186-207; stephen david ross (ed.), art and its significance, 2nd ed., albany 1987, pp. 584-91; as well as in beyond recognition, cited above (note 29), pp. 166-90.
41¡¢craig owens, ¡®outlaws: gay men in feminism¡¯, in alice jardine and paul smith (eds), men in feminism, new york, 1987, pp. 219-32; reprinted in beyond recognition, cited above (note 29), pp. 218-35.
42¡¢crimp, ¡®boys¡¯, cited above (note 32). compare his ¡®appropriating appropriation¡¯, catalogue essay for image scavengers: photography, institute of contemporary art, philadelphia, 1983.
43¡¢steven c. dubin, arresting images: impolitic art and uncivil actions, new york, 1992, pp. 208-19. for an overview of david wojnarowicz¡¯s work, see larry blinderman (ed.), tongues of flame, university galleries, illinois state university, 1990.
44¡¢amy harrison, guerrillas in our midst, documentary film, 1992.
45¡¢kiss & tell (susan stewart, persimmon blackbridge and lizard jones), drawing the line: lesbian sexual politics on the wall, vancouver, 1991, n.p.
¹²6Ò³: ÉÏÒ»Ò³ [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] 6